BETRAYED BY OUR "FRIENDS"

As US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice embarked on her maiden voyage, it was reported that she departed from America armed with a new policy paper on how to implement the Quartet's road map produced by the James Baker Institute for Public Policy at Rice University. According to Edward Djerejian, the former US ambassador to Syria who directs the Baker Center, the paper, with its detailed recommendations, is a "street map to the road map." One of the things that make the paper significant is that it bears former US secretary of state James Baker's name. Not only did Baker serve under the president's father, he now plays a formal role in mobilizing international support for Iraqi reconstruction efforts. As well, the team that composed the report included senior policy makers from the US, the Palestinian Authority, Egypt, Canada and the World Bank. The US was represented by current Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs William Burns as well as by Norman Olsen, the political counselor at the US embassy in Israel.
The PA was represented by security strongman Jibril Rajoub and by senior aides to Mahmoud Abbas, Yasser Arafat and Ahmed Qurei. Egypt was represented by Dictator Hosni Mubarak's senior adviser Osama El Baz and by General Hossam Khair Allah. Now we turn to another Post columnist, Ruthie Blum, who happens to be the daughter of Commentary editor Norman Podhoretz. Another reader added the bold letters for emphasis.
To understand this piece we shall turn to our list of CFR members: http://www.apfn.net/CFR.htm

From JPOST
Who's Right?
Ruthie Blum, THE JERUSALEM POST Feb. 17, 2005

In Bush, both Israeli and American conservatives believed the US had found a president who not only recognized this threat, but who was willing to put his money where his mouth was and do something about it. That he unapologetically surrounded himself with what his attackers called the "neoconservative cabal" (his administration included the likes of Douglas Feith, Elliott Abrams, Paul Wolfowitz and others) – and simultaneously befriended Sharon – deepened the natural three-way alliance between Washington, Jerusalem and the conservatives, who finally felt their ideas were being adopted by the leaders of both countries. And that, for the first time in decades, America was not pressuring Israel to make concessions that would be harmful to its interests...

But most others, including Podhoretz, his wife, Midge Decter, syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer and Weekly Standard Editor William Kristol, are behind Sharon. As a result, Commentary and the Weekly Standard, which published numerous pieces against the Oslo Accords, have been relatively quiet over the disengagement plan.

Hudson Institute head Herb London, who supports the plan, says the split on the Right over disengagement is not as peculiar as it appears.

"Such disagreements are not unusual among conservatives," he said. "We've had many such arguments, including over the war in Iraq – not the principle behind it, but the details. The idea is for the Palestinians to democratize. It is the way to achieve this that's being debated."

LikeLondon, Podhoretz and Decterconsider the plan to be completely different from Oslo in terms both of its goals and of the risks involved, mainly because of Bush.

"The toppling of Saddam, and Bush's determination to reshape the entire region, have created an entirely new context," Podhoretz said.

"You can't compare today's world, in which Bush is president, Sharon is prime minister and Arafat is dead, to the Oslo years, when Clinton and Barak were the main players, and when Arafat and Shimon Peres won the Nobel Peace Prize," Decter added.

Gaffney, though an opponent of disengagement, agrees with London's assessment that the split among conservatives over this issue is "not so much ideological, as tactical."

"The conservatives who support withdrawal from Gaza at this stage think of it as a stratagem," he said, "different from Oslo precisely because it is Sharon implementing it. This bolsters the arguments of Deputy National Security Adviser Elliott Abrams and others who see Sharon as a robust security man," and the plan as "a relatively low-risk experiment."

Now let us see if our insightful political analysts note a pattern:

Douglas Feith - CFR
Elliott Abrams - CFR
Midge Decter - CFR
Charles Krauthammer - CFR
William Kristol is not CFR but his father Irving is.
Herbert London - CFR
Norman Podhoretz - CFR

Well, could it be that the American Jewish Conservative and Right Wing thinkers fooled the Israeli Conservative and Right Wing writers? Is it possible the Israeli "thinkers" were betrayed from day one and are too petty to admit it?

end part one

Well thank goodness, at least my readership has caught on. Here are a few typical letters received this week:

BARRY, IS IT SHEER COINCIDENCE THAT BOTH DORE GOLD AND NATAN SHARANSKY WILL BOTH BE IN LONDON NEXT MONDAY EVENING, THE DAY BEFORE THE "SELL OUT CONFERENCE" ON "PALESTINE" ORGANISED BY THE UK? NO DOUBT THEY WILL ALSO BE PRESENT AS "OBSERVERS".

Hi Barry ~ I just want to let you know I've heard evidence that your take on Daniel Pipes (CFR) is correct. I heard him speak at an AIPAC fundraiser and membership drive in Denver in March 2004, and was stunned at the insubstantial, non-committal tepidness of his support for Israel's protection in a mere 19-minute talk, for which I surmise he was paid big bucks. Later, in another room at the event where he was answering questions privately, he dodged my precise questions about the "Toady Map" being a ploy to facilitate the destruction of Israel. Rather than answer them, he told me he was "a big picture guy," and was not able to answer such detailed questions. I was rather shocked and immediately "grokked" that his agenda is other than what he advertises. I then felt like saying to him, "Et tu, Brute?"

* * *
As you may be aware, I am a regular contributor on Arutz Sheva, among other places. I have been aware of Pipes for a while, having been tipped off about to him 18 months ago by a member of the Hudson Institute who loves Israel and despises the CFR.

Some advanced Sabbataian knowledge available at:
http://webpages.charter.net/reform/
http://www.surfingtheapocalypse.net/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=53907
http://www.unitedisrael.org/United-Israel-Organization-Information/Founder-David-Horowitz.html
http://www.deuceofclubs.com/books/145_horowitz.htm#33candles
http://www.livius.org/men-mh/messiah/messiah_l06.html




* * *
A Book Review

endtimes-news-events@yahoogroups.com

SHABTAI TZVI, LABOR ZIONISM AND THE HOLOCAUST by Barry Chamish
Review by R. Kossover ?© February, 2005
Barry Chamish's latest book Shabtai Tzvi, Labor Zionism & the Holocaust is 247 pages in the English soft cover edition. An edition in Hebrew will be available in mid February.
Barry Chamish, an Israeli writer born in North America, came to prominence when he disputed the official story of the assassination of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin almost a decade ago. Mr. Chamish's books are largely a compendium of the essays he writes detailing the results of his investigations. Since beginning his work on Yitzhak Rabin's assassination, he has brought to light the nature of the top down corruption in this country, concentrating on the determination of successive Israeli regimes to undo the ideal and the reality of a Jewish state here.
Those familiar with his other books, Who Murdered Yitzhak Rabin?,The Last Days of Israel, and Save Israel, will recognize the basic themes which are also continued in Shabtai Tzvi, Labor Zionism & the Holocaust.

These themes are that:
Israel?'s leadership has been corrupted and bought out entirely by foreigners, largely the leadership of the European Union, the Vatican and the United States, as represented by the Council of Foreign Relations. A sub-theme to this is that the intent of the Council of Foreign Relations can be discerned clearly from many policy documents that it has published over the decades, and its intent with respect to Israel is crystal clear to those willing to read these documents.
The Oslo Peace Process is a means by which the European Union and the United States intend first to weaken and then to destroy the Jewish State. One finds extensive evidence that many terrorist hits are in reality executions planned by the Jewish section of the Shabak (Hebrew abbreviation for General Security Service) and then carried out based on information leaked to Arabs who are conveniently killed or allowed to escape capture.
In order to effectively implement the weakening and then the destruction of the Jewish State, a secret war has been waged on those who live in Judea and Samaria with the first stage being to alienate the Israeli public from these people and then buying out those who will be bought out, and killing the leaders who won't be bought out. Anyone who has been suspected of threatening the continuance of this process has been killed or strong attempts have been made to marginalize them, including Barry Chamish.
Finally, that Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin was not assassinated by Yigal Amir, but by a hit squad controlled by Shimon Peres, and no effort has been spared in attempting to cover up this fact.

Nevertheless, in all of his previous books, Mr. Chamish has concentrated on the who, what, when, where and how? of all of these themes.
On page 202 of Shabtai Tzvi, Labor Zionism & the Holocaust, Mr. Chamish begins to tackle the key issue absent from his other works is“ WHY. From this comes the title of the book. I suggest reading this chapter of the book first.
In this chapter of the book, Mr. Chamish traces the origins not merely of Labor Zionism, but also of a number of movements within Judaism what seem to be counter to what Judaism believes in. In this chapter of the book, Mr. Chamish, using the work of Rabbi Marvin Antelman as his guide, traces the influence of the false messiah, Shabtai Tzvi, a Turkish Jew who lived in the16th century, through to the 1700`s in the person of a man named Jakob Frank, and his many contacts in the German Jewish world and the Roman Catholic Church. He goes further, tracing a web of evil through the 18th and 19th centuries and finally to today.

This chapter of the book should be scary and sobering to any Jew who comprehends its implications. Briefly, it explains the phenomenon of what more and more writers of late have been calling "unJews" or non-Jewish Jews. I strongly recommend buying and reading this work, and contemplating it carefully. Many bookstores in Israel refuse to carry Mr. Chamish's books, scared off by government intimidation.

Barry`s Archive Index