Please click here to buy Barry`s books, CD`s & Videos...
canadian drug store, Health Insurance, Medicare supplement insurance, Long Term Care, Guaranteed issue health insurance, Cheap Dental insurance
February 21 - No Sympathy For Har-Shefi.
February 19 - Jerusalem Post Deletes Radio Interview.
February 14 - The Guilt-Ridden Jews of the New World Order.
February 12 - Rabin's Last Doctor and the Knights Templar.
February 9 - No Reason to Celebrate Sharon's Victory.
Back to Barry`s Archive Index
February 21 - No Sympathy For Har-Shefi. |
Yesterday, the Israeli Supreme Court turned down Margalit Har Shefi's petition to appeal her indictment for failure to prevent the murder of Yitzhak Rabin. So she's off to the slammer for nine months and I feel no sympathy for her whatsoever. Here's why. Shortly after Yitzhak Rabin's murder, Margalit Har Shefi was arrested as a suspect in a wider conspiracy than just Yigal Amir. Not long after her incarceration, the Shabak (General Security Services) provocateur Avishai Raviv was placed inside her cell. Since mixing the sexes in Israeli jails is forbidden, we can be pretty sure that Har Shefi had some Shabak ties of her own. But so did her uncle, Rabbi Benny Elon who will soon be sitting in the new Sharon government. A few days after, Elon broke the news that Yigal Amir's good buddy in the Eyal movement, Avishai Raviv was a Shabak agent and Eyal was a Shabak creation. How did Eilon know before anyone else? He knew because HE worked with Raviv and I have solid witnesses to back me up. Elon hung around young people at anti-Oslo rallies and directed them into the arms of Avishai Raviv. As one Eyal teenager told me, "I was at a protest rally outside Orient House and Benny Elon told me, 'You have to meet this guy.' Then he introduced me to Avishai. He was the matchmaker between me and Raviv and because of him, I could have been Yigal Amir." Early in my research I worked with two filmmakers, Merav Ktorza and Alon Eilat, who turned out to be inappropriate to the task. But they did score a few coups and one occurred in a meeting with Elon. He told them that a couple of months before the assassination, Yitzhak Shamir called him into his office and told him, 'They're going to kill Rabin and blame the Right. They're planning another Arlozoroff and this time we won't get back in power for another fifty years. I want you to identify potential assassins in your community to prevent the murder." Elon refused to repeat the statement on camera but there are two strong witnesses who said he made it. Margalit Har Shefi, a political organizer at Bar Ilan University started palling around with two Shabak assets, Avishai Raviv and Yigal Amir. Amir was the chief social director and public speaker of Eyal. His task was to attract idealistic young people opposed to the Oslo Accords and turn them into hyper-extremist criminals. The youths he attracted at his Shabbat seminars and his yeshivah speaking engagements were then directed into the clutches of Raviv and Eyal. Amir and Benny Elon were doing the same thing for the Shabak. And I strongly suspected so was Har Shefi and said so publicly at the Rabin Assassination Conference last Dec. 31 in Jerusalem. Listening to me in the audience was Har Shefi's grandmother Pnina Peli. She approached me after my speech, introduced herself and said, "You're right about Margalit and Benny but you've got the motive all wrong." I quickly directed her to a semi-quiet nook in the auditorium and asked her what she meant. "They were supposed to do a good thing, stop a political assassination. They didn't know the Shabak was using them." Too many people were approaching me with questions and I asked Mrs. Peli to meet me at the end of the conference. However, the event went on too long and I had to suffice myself with our two minutes of conversation. But I think what she said was wise and right. Benny Elon was an early activist for truth about the Rabin assassination. He testified at the Shamgar Commission about Raviv's activities and then, as far as I know, never made a public accusation again. That task was left to his wife Emunah who collected all the newspaper clippings about Raviv in one damning volume called The Raviv File. And then she stopped her activities. The Benny Elon family know all about Raviv and the more lurid background of the Rabin murder but they have not helped Margalit Har Shefi in any way. The opposite. Benny Elon's left wing brother was hired as Har Shefi's lawyer and he simply did not defend her. Worse, he incriminated her even more deeply. His chosen defence was that Har Shefi didn't take Amir's threats against Rabin seriously and to prove it he coached Har Shefi to stress the fact that she asked her rabbi if Amir's biblical justifications for Rabin's murder were legitimate. What a trap he laid for Har Shefi! Obviously if she went to her rabbi, she did take Amir seriously and thus should have informed the police about him. That's the way the judges saw it and from then on Har Shefi's chances for acquittal were over. Margalit Har Shefi had the best defence of all. She was innocent of the charge of not preventing Yigal Amir from murdering Yitzhak Rabin because he didn't do it. She and her family have been contacted by numerous friends and given the documentation. There is not an honest court on earth which would convict Amir because there is no evidence against him. But there is a whole pile of solid evidence against Rabin's bodyguard, Yoram Rubin, who did shoot him and almost as much against Shimon Peres, who indirectly ordered him to. And if Har Shefi and her family were really interested in saving her from prison, they would have used it. And if Benny Elon really cared about his niece, he would have testified to what he knew about Raviv and the murder. And if Margalit Har Shefi wanted to be free, she would have told the truth about Eyal. Now, I know they were warned not to. And we can be sure the warnings were terrible and terrifying. However, there are other people trying to get to the bottom of the Rabin assassination who have suffered in similar ways and I'm one of them. I'm taking ridiculous risks, so how can I be sympathetic to Har Shefi when she won't tell the truth to save her life? I can only suggest a strong action which could redeem her. On February 27, in Jerusalem District Court, Avishai Raviv's trial begins again. He is also charged with failure to prevent Rabin's murder and his role is a great deal deeper than Har Shefi's. It would be a very good idea for her and her advocates to sit in his trial if the sessions are open. Raviv's trial must be scrutinized without letup, not just for her sake, but for Rabin's and that of the Jewish nation. The phone number of the court is 02 6706411. She would be wise to find out if the trial will be open and when. And she would be wiser if her supporters filled the courtroom at all times. Meanwhile, Rabin's real murderer Shimon Peres is on his way to the Sharon cabinet, while Margalit Har Shefi is on her way to prison. Such is the upside down moral reality of Israel. |
February 19 - Jerusalem Post Deletes Radio Interview. |
Josh Wander, the gutsy Jerusalem Post Radio interviewer, who's conversation with me was placed on the Weekender section of the Post's radio page last Thursday, just called to say that, "Our interview was taken off the site. The order came from higher-ups." In that interview, I traced Ariel Sharon's ties to the Council On Foreign Relations and promised listeners that there would be no change of policy with the new prime minister, only a change of style. Oslo would continue and its promulgators, Ehud Barak and Shimon Peres would lead the cabinet as before. "I think what got them angry, "explained Wander, "were your accusations against Henry Kissinger. I heard he's on the Post board." That wouldn't surprise me since the chairman of this board is CFR hotshot Conrad Black. In the past few days I have received a torrent of mail about the interview. Typical was this comment from Australia; "Israel has a true free media. In Australia they ban opinions against the CFR and other hidden governors." Wander noted, "I know, it's like the Rabin assassination, you were hushed up." Was the interview deleted because I used salacious language or made false accusations? My correspondence hints at nothing of the kind. Here is a letter from an editor of the ZNS press service; Hi Barry: Shalom, and "todah rabah" for the link to your "Jerusalem Post" radio interview. I found it fascinating for several reasons. First, it was gratifying to me to hear you expose the CFR. You did a magnificent job, especially considering the limited time available to you on that show. You were superb! Second, you packed more meat and potatoes into the few minutes available to you than any other guest I've heard on radio. Your presentation was very, very well organized, it never flagged, and you articulated your points clearly. Third, your familiarity with the past 50 years or so of international political history was readily apparent. You came across to me as a extremely intelligent, mature, level-headed, and dedicated scholar-journalist. I salute you! Again, many thanks for pointing me to your radio interview. Hearing your voice and delivery style helped me think of you more as a real person, a friend of mine in Israel. If you know Rabbi Marvin Antelman, and if you could visit him, he could show you his copy of my recent book, "Money -- Ye shall have honest weights and measures." To find out more about "Money," visit http://www.principiapub.com. "Money" blows the whistle on the CFR but does so only indirectly. Shalom. Best wishes, Jim Ewart So I'm hushed up, meanwhile, Sharon is determined to place two totally corrupt politicos in his cabinet. Barak will soon face the music for approving an election financing scam involving fleecing foreign donors through phoney charitable funds which lined his back pocket, and Peres's central role in murdering Yitzhak Rabin will soon become the country's scandal of the century. And meanwhile, eight young men and women are murdered in a bus atrocity and Hizbullah murders a soldier on patrol and our government exacts precisely no revenge. And meanwhile, Arafat flies to Spain and Morocco last week, followed by a snap visit to Israel by Spain's prime minister and our government hides the fact that its decisions are being determined through Spain and the Vatican. And meanwhile I am being fed information which I cannot yet confirm but which you're going to get anyway. I'm told Clinton's Marc Rich pardon is leading in a most unpleasant direction for him. Certain people tracing the extent of his bribes have uncovered tantalizing hints that Clinton was about to receive a huge chunk of money from an Arab oil account if he succeeded in getting Israel out of Judea and Samaria and East Jerusalem before the end of his term. And on Dec. 31/2000, the first conference on the Rabin assassination was held in Jerusalem. I am told the event terrified our security establishment so much that they decided to create a diversion so big, that it would sabotage the conference. The incident was the murder of Binyamin Kahane and his wife Talya. That's what I was told. And now, for doing my best to save my dying nation, the Jerusalem Post has deleted their radio interview with me. If you think that is unfair, their complaints dept. can be reached at letters@jpost.co.il. Look what that interview uncovered. Thanks to the courage of Josh Wander, solid proof of Sharon's CFR connections emerged. |
February 14 - The Guilt-Ridden Jews of the New World Order. |
A couple of weeks back, Shimon Peres and Yasir Arafat shared the podium at the World Economic Conference in Davos, Switzerland. In attendance was a Jewish journalist named Thomas Friedman. After Arafat cursed Israel for half an hour and Peres shook his hand after the display of venomous hatred, Friedman was so shocked that he told an Israeli economics journalist, Stephan Plosker that, "You have no peace partner until Arafat leaves the scene." My, what a revelation from a New York Times Middle East "expert" who has spent two decades eroding Israel's position in the US! That day, a true revelation appeared on an Israeli political site www.debka.com. The writers there noted that it didn't matter what Arafat said or who witnessed it in the audience, the real business took place behind the scenes "at the exclusive meetings of the Bilderberg group." Yesterday, a few people sent me a TV listing from the US. It seems that CFR member Daniel Pipes, the author of two books on "conspiracy theories," would be exposing, on a History Channel program, the paranoia of those who believe organizations like,"The Skull and Bones Society, Council On Foreign Relations and Bilderberg Group," are up to plots against the people of the planet." I have before me the latest membership list of the CFR; Pipes in on it and so is Thomas Friedman. To remind those who don't remember, during the 1980s, the New York Times sent two correspondents to Israel, David Shipler and Thomas Friedman. Shipler came first and he was a far less talented writer than his successor. However, he provided Friedman with most of his contacts, many of whom were Israeli Uncle Toms like Rabbi David Hartman, who liked the publicity and pandered to the reporters, telling them what New York radical Liberals liked to hear. Both Shipler and Friedman wrote books about their experiences as NY Times correspondents in Israel. Neither book had anything to do with the actual country of Israel and Shipler's long forgotten volume was atrociously written. But both journalists were awarded Pulitzer Prizes for creating an Israel which uniformly despised the Likud leadership and longed for close personal relationships with their Arab neighbors. Friedman's book, From Beirut To Jerusalem, was far more damaging than Shipler's because it was readable. Within, Friedman created out of the Middle East, a little New York, filled with fine people, all with impeccably good hearts. With a little understanding and lots of Israeli concessions, Lebanon could become another Long Island and Israel, the Borough of Queens. The damage came because Friedman put all the onus on Israel to be more charitable and was completely blind to the Medieval savagery of the people Israel is stuck with as neighbors. However, since the recent Davos meeting, Friedman is sorry he wrote all that stuff. At least that's what his fellow CFRer Daniel Pipes writes in today's Jerusalem Post. But let us wait before analyzing this "masterful" apology. First, let us look at the real world. By a coincidence, last night, I finished reading a truly masterful work; Europe's Full Circle - Corporate Elites And The New Fascism by British economic writer Rodney Atkinson. This is a sober expose of the Bilderberg Group and its allies in the Royal Institute For International Affairs in London and the Council On Foreign Relations in New York. The author concludes that these groups are dedicated to completing the economic plan of the Nazis and their Vatican compatriots, and in Europe the means is the Maastricht Treaty. Allow me to quote Atkinson: "The European Union is based precisely on the social and economic structures of 'The European Economic Community' proposed by the Hitler regime in 1941. The covert and undemocratic methods of forcing European rule on Britain - through Treaty law, directives and regulations which largely bypass parliament - had their equivalent in the emergency laws by which Hitler governed Germany... The Treaty Of Rome which brought the European Community into being was nurtured at Bilderberg meetings." Atkinson is kind enough to present a list of those who attended the exclusive 1995 Bilderberg Conference on forced economic globalization and guess who's name appears alongside Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller?; none other than NY Times Foreign Affairs columnist, Thomas Friedman! Today CFRer Daniel Pipes, decided to bail out his fellow CFR member, who just happens to also be a Bilderberger, the distinguished journalist Thomas Friedman. Now keeping in mind that Pipes is a proud conspiracy debunker, how does he do it? First he introduces his colleague, "Thomas Friedman may be the journalist who has the most influence on the way the outside world understands the Arab-Israel conflict." Maybe true, but now we learn how he views the issue; "His signature concept is applying a globalization theory to the conflict." Ooh, could he have picked that up at his Bilderberg/CFR meetings by some chance??? "If Arabs and Israelis would concentrate on fulfilling the imperatives of globalization, he argues, they would not only live better but also find themselves too busy making money to hate each other." This was not just Friedman's stupid idea but note, this is also Peres's New Middle East and isn't it a cosy coincidence that both Peres and Friedman were at Davos together this year? It was this globalization concept of Peres and his partner in crime Yossi Beilin, that led them to handing the PLO 40,000 rifles and thus turned both into accessories to mass murder. But Pipes forgives Friedman his role in Israel's bloodletting because, "Of late, Friedman has woken up to Middle Eastern realities." As if better late than never works out fine this time around. But that's okay, too because, "To his credit, Friedman has candidly acknowledged his mystification...Sadder but wiser, Thomas Friedman is learning a deeper truth about the Middle East. This is one region where politics trumps economics." And so we end on an upbeat note. The world's number one propagandizer against Israel is sorry. He was wrong all along. And thanks to his Lodge buddy Pipes, we're all going to thank him for changing his mind. Even those Jews mourning their dead will be grateful because Friedman has seen the light at last. Back to Atkinson's Bilderberg list; what struck me was the paucity of Jewish Bilderberg members. The vast majority of members are from Northern Europe. There are undoubtedly Jews who have lost their moral compass and are plotting a world government based on the Nazi model but Friedman's about-face leads to the conclusion that others were invited as dupes, to promote an agenda they were too dim-witted to see through. Which leads to a final question; when will Daniel Pipes get a brain and stop aiding his worst enemies? |
February 12 - Rabin's Last Doctor and the Knights Templar. |
We now enter the realm of the truly bizarre as we look at the doctor who last examined Yitzhak Rabin, the State Pathologist, Dr. Yehuda Hiss. Israelis know too well that their government's coroner is corrupt. In September 1999, Judge Ruth Orr overturned a conviction against a Jewish resident of Judea and Samaria for the shooting murder of an Arab boy because she accused Dr. Hiss of forging the forensic evidence against him. It was the second time in a year that a murder conviction was overturned because Hiss had falsified an autopsy for political purposes. He had earlier been caught doctoring the facts to secure a wrongful rap against the parents of a murdered child. His biggest fabrication of all occurred after the country's most ghastly scandal was proven. In the first decade of Israel's existence, the Labor government kidnapped over 4500 babies, mostly of new Yemenite immigrant parents, and sold them off for adoption and medical experiments, mostly abroad. Through the efforts of Yemenite groups fighting to expose this crime, three years ago one mother, Margalit Omeisse was reunited with her daughter Celia Levine, given up for adoption to a California couple almost half a century before. Besides looking like twins, the Hebrew University genetics laboratory proved they were mother and daughter by DNA testing. Dr. Hiss retested the two for the government and lo and behold, found that Hebrew University was wrong. And that's why his nickname in certain circles is Dr. Coverup. People started calling him that about a year after the Rabin assassination. He conducted a partial autopsy of Rabin and concluded he was shot twice in the back from medium range. In 1996, Rabin's hospital records were uncovered and over ten doctors and nurses signed very different accounts of Rabin's demise. He was actually shot three times, twice from point blank range and once frontally in the upper chest. On top of that, Rabin's spine was shattered and Hiss categorically reported that it wasn't. Because the patsy Yigal Amir never shot from point blank range or from the front, and because the assassination film proved Rabin's spine could not have been broken since he kept right on walking after the shot to his back, somebody must have asked Hiss to alter the medical facts. So he did and then the government's commission of inquiry into the murder adopted Hiss's lies as the official version of Rabin's death. So we knew that Hiss was corrupt and that he molded his reports to fit government orders. What we didn't know was that he is also genuinely ghoulish. Avi and Nitzana (Darshan) Leitner are Yigal Amir's attorneys. They also represent another victim of Dr. Hiss, the family of Alisdair Sinclair. On April 14, 1998, 47 year old Alisdair Sinclair, was stopped by customs officials at Ben Gurion Airport on his way out of the country after a six day stay. They found 9000 Deutsche marks in a false bottom of his handbag and he was arrested without charge. The police thought the false bottom suggested something illegal though hiding a large amount of money is a legitimate means of thwarting theft. At the airport police station, Sinclair was found strangling on his shoelaces. He was rushed to hospital and pronounced dead. From there his body was transferred to the Abu Kabir Institute For Forensic Medicine and straight into the paws of Dr. Yehuda Hiss, who conducted an autopsy which concluded that Sinclair had killed himself. After that, there was a problem with the body. Sinclair was unmarried, his parents weren't alive and he had been living a rather rootless life in Amsterdam dealing in vintage guitars and strumming them at local pubs. It took three days to track down his family in Scotland and the police offered to bury him in Israel. The family refused and paid about $5000 to fly the corpse home. On May 13, another autopsy was conducted, at the University of Glasgow and guess what? The hyoid bone at the base of the tongue was missing and so was the heart. Both were removed by Dr. Hiss. But why? No problem guessing why the hyoid bone was gone. It would reveal that Sinclair did not hang himself but was strangled by other means. But the heart..? Avi Leitner can only say, "Our best guess is that Hiss is involved the the black market trade in human organs. We can't prove that yet, but it seems the most likely motive for removing a healthy heart." Incredibly, a most unlikely source provides an even spookier motive. But let's get on with the story first. The Sinclair family started investigating Alisdair's recent life and none of his friends thought him remotely suicidal. Nor did they understand why he was arrested for carrying perfectly legal currency in the first place. Israel police explained that they suspected he was a drug dealer and under interrogation he admitted to have smuggled in thousands of Ecstasy pills the week before, though he did not know who bought them. Alisdair's brother James, of Selkirk, Scotland mocked the police version, noting accurately, that since he wasn't caught with drugs, he had no reason whatsoever to confess to the supposed crime. Enter the British government. Tel Aviv embassy official Suad Andraus was furious, stating, "People don't just die in lockup." The British authorities demand that Dr. Hiss explain what he did with the heart and then return it immediately. Hiss explained that as a drug smuggling suspect, the heart would have shown "signs of longterm drug abuse." Fine, so why didn't he return the heart with the rest of the body? According to Hiss: "It's true we didn't inform the family in Scotland that the heart was missing. Frankly, we didn't want to upset them." How thoughtful, and returning the body without the heart wasn't in the least bit upsetting???? Hiss complied to the second demand and turned over the heart to the Sinclair family, or at least a heart. A not very convincing heart, at that. The Sinclair Family demanded DNA proof that this was Alistair's heart but Dr. Hiss refused, citing the $6000 cost of the test. The Sinclairs found the cost prohibitive as well but this time, the British authorities did not press the issue or conduct their own tests. A frustrated James Sinclair expressed his disgust with the inconsistencies of his brother's strange demise. "Alisdair never had a police record and it is unlikely that he would turn to drug smuggling. And he repeats,"Why would he admit to anything if his bloody suitcase was empty? My brother was an intelligent, well read man. He wasn't daft." Currently, the Israeli Police are conducting DNA tests and James is awaiting the results, clearly unaware that if Dr. Yehuda "Coverup" Hiss has his hands in the testing, the findings will be as honest as those of the Rabin assassination. And now a most unexpected motive for the whole affair. It was published in the Jerusalem Report, a staid, establishment newsmagazine which is used as a fount of disinformation on behalf of the country's Labor Party. This peculiar passage may be of interest to those questioning Britain's early and deep interest in Zionism, their reverence for Chaim Weizmann, the Balfour Declaration, The British-Israel Society, the Round Table policies of Cecil Rhodes and Lord Milner and the like. "According to Alisdair's brother James, family lore has it that the Sinclairs are descended from the crusading Knights Templars, who journeyed to Jerusalem in the mid-1300s in search of holy artifacts from Herod's Temple to bring back to Scottish hero Robert Bruce. Alisdair himself, says James, was particularly proud of his middle name, Roslyn, the name of a chapel in Scotland whose floor plan is said to be based on Herod's Temple. James mentions these details in attempting to reconstruct his brother's motive for travelling to Israel." How does this Medieval history explain Alisdair Sinclair's missing heart? Researchers of the Templars present clues that may explain Hiss' ghoulish crime. Let us begin with a marvelous history of the Knights Templar written by two Freemasons Christopher Knight and Robert Lomas, called The Second Messiah. Summarized is their history of the organization: The Templars were a poor chivalric order which disdained materialism until their arrival in Jerusalem in the early twelfth century on a papal crusade. Eleven knights dug under the ruins of Solomon's Temple for nine years and hit paydirt. Under the Temple Mount the Templars discovered a network of tunnels where the Jewish priests hid their treasures from the marauding Romans in 70 AD. The knights not only uncovered some of the gold and silver described in the Copper Scroll of the Dead Sea Scrolls but the records of the first Jerusalem church of Christianity. This according to Knight and Lomas is precisely what they went digging for. The first Bishop of the Jerusalem Church was Jesus' brother James. He was aided by Jesus' other siblings, five brothers and two sisters. After the Romans destroyed Jerusalem and dispersed the Jews, James and his family fled to France, a fact confirmed by the bestselling book Holy Blood, Holy Grail. These descendants of the holy Davidic line had the wherewithal to gain wealth throughout Europe and buy vast properties. Over time they constituted a good chunk of European royalty. While professing whatever religion the state demanded, first worshiping the pantheon of Roman Gods and later papal Christianity, they secretly practised the Christianity of the early Jerusalem church. These descendants of the priestly line, now called themselves Rex Deus, and passed on their traditions throughout the royal courts of Europe where they ruled. The original Celt church was founded by the Rex Deus, and St. Patrick of Ireland was a Jew. Other Rex Deus included the Habsburgs, the Stuarts of Scotland and today's King Juan Carlos of Spain, who includes among his titles, Protector Of The Holy Places Of Jerusalem. The Templars returned from their Crusade with vast wealth uncovered under the Temple Mount and initiated a monumental building program in Europe, which ultimately resulted in the construction of over 250 castles and Gothic churches. They now challenged the papacy for political control of Europe, yet the usually jealous Vatican allowed their power to grow unabated. Knight and Lomas insist this is because the Templars had a huge advantage over Rome. According to their version of events, the Knights uncovered the original records of the Jerusalem Church and they prove that Jesus was a prophet but not a deity. His goal was to organize armed resistance to the Roman tyrants and re-establish an independent Jewish nation. Lest my Christian readers object, it is more than a little consolation knowing that Knight and Lomas are proud Freemasons and are promoting their own Masonic agenda. There is no obligation to take them theologically at their word. However, historically they are on solider ground because the rest of their tale is mostly provable fact. In the fourteenth century, the French king known as Philip the Fair coordinated a purge of the Templars in coordination with the Holy See. Their properties were seized and their leader, in fact the last Templar leader, Jacques de Molay was brutally tortured by crucifixion until he confessed to the sins of his Order. He survived the first round of torture and a linen cloth was placed over him to absorb his blood and keep him warm. This cloth became known as the Shroud of Turin and the authors arguments for this claim are superbly grounded in fact. A group of Templars led by the St. Clair clan escaped the French siege by ship and landed in Scotland, a safe port since it was ruled by the Rex Deus member, Robert the Bruce. It must be noted that at his death, Robert the Bruce's heart was transported to Jerusalem for burial. Two versions of what happened to it exist. The first says the deliverers of the heart were captured in Spain, the second insists they made it and the heart lays buried in Jerusalem to this day. An unpublished historian of the Templars, Daniel Leary notes: "The name Sinclair comes from the hermit St. Clare or St. Clere, who lived near the town that is now called St. Clair sur l'Epte, northwest of Paris, France. Sinclair's ancestors took their surname from an abbey that was named after the hermit, because that was the site where in the year 911 their ancestor Rollo the Viking, signed the treaty with King Louis the Simple of France that created Rollo hereditary Duke of the new Duchy of Normandy. "Rollo's descendants included the nine St. Clare knights who accompanied their cousin William the Conqueror (also a descendant of Rollo) to England in 1066. They assisted his victory at the battle of Hastings, 14 Oct 1066. Many of them remained in England. "The Sinclairs played a prominent role in the history of the British Isles and were particularly important in Scotland. Through marriage, their family became related to the Bruces and the Stewarts. One of them, Henry St. Clair (1275-1336) both fought at Bannockburn and signed the Declaration of Arbroath of 4 Apr 1320 from Scottish nobles to the pope that declared Scottish independence." According to Knight and Lomas, the French Templars brought with them the damning scrolls from under the Jerusalem Temple Mount and built a chapel in Rosslyn, near Edinburgh to house them. The chapel, built by William Sinclair (1415- 1482), which exists today, was built according to the specifications of the Herodian Temple and an exact duplicate of the Western Wall was constructed alongside it. To hide their now-banned Templar roots, the Knights formed a new organization, Freemasonry, whose rites were precisely those set down in the scrolls recovered from beneath Jerusalem's Temple Mount. Scottish rite Masonry spread throughout Europe and according to Knight and Lomas, much to the chagrin of the Vatican. In their version of events, in 1717, the pro-Catholic Hanoverian dynasty took over the British crown and ordered vast changes in Masonic rites. The 33 Scottish degrees were reduced to just four in the new English rites and all the secrets within the Jerusalem scrolls were eliminated from lodge ceremonies. However, other writers share a different version of events, insisting the Templars and the Vatican remained partners throughout their public trials. F. Tupper Saussy in his excellent book, Rulers Of Evil writes: "On March 22, 1312, Clement V dissolved the Knights Templar with his decree Vox clamantis. But the dissolution proved a mere formality to further appease Philip (the Fair). More importantly, it permitted the Templars, in other manifestations to continue enriching the papacy...A subtle provision in Vox clamantis transferred most Templar estates to the Knights of St. John of Jerusalem. In Germany and Austria, the Templars became "Rosicrucians" and "Teutonic Knights." Six centuries later, as the "Teutonic Order," the Knights would provide the nucleus of Adolph Hitler's political support in Munich and Vienna." In his massive work Vatican Assassins, Eric Jon Phelps comes to practically the same conclusion. In his version of events, the Jesuit Order infiltrated Scottish Freemasonry in the sixteenth century and since then, the Templars have been doing the work of the true ruler of the Vatican, the Supreme General of the Jesuits who both Saussy and Phelps call, the Black Pope. Daniel Leary concurs on the Templar/Vatican alliance. "These 2nd sons of European gentry have had a long close relationship with Rome and still act as the Vatican's bankers and intelligence operatives. Plus, they're current membership includes a rouges gallery of modern intrigue, not the least of which being the father of the US president elect, former president George Bush Sr..." We now jump to 1993 and a "peace" process has begun between Israel and the PLO. In March 1994, the newspaper Chadashot revealed a most remarkable secret of the Middle East "peace" process. A friend of Shimon Peres, the French intellectual Marek Halter, claimed in an interview that in May 1993, he delivered a letter from Peres to the pope. Within, Peres promised to internationalize Jerusalem, granting the UN political control of the Old City of Jerusalem, and the Vatican hegemony of the holy sites within. The UN would give the PLO a capital within its new territory and East Jerusalem would become a kind of free trade zone of world diplomacy. Halter's claim was backed by the Italian newspaper La Stampa which added that Arafat was apprised of the agreement and it was included in the secret clauses of the Declaration Of Principles signed in Washington in September 1993. In March 1995, the Israeli radio station Arutz Sheva was leaked a cable from the Israeli Embassy in Rome to Peres's Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem confirming the handover of Jerusalem to the Vatican. This cable was printed on the front page of the radical leftwing Israeli newspaper, Haaretz two days later. A scandal erupted and numerous rabbis who had invited Peres for Passover services cancelled their invitations in protest of his treachery. Peres reacted by claiming that the cable was real but that someone had whited out the word, "not;" the cable really said that Israel would "not" hand Jerusalem over to the holy pontiff. Illustrating the sorry political state of Israel's rabbis, they accepted this cockamamie excuse and re-invited Peres to their tables. However, in the widely distributed minutes of a meeting with Clinton in 1997, Peres reiterated his diplomacy, ending with the words, "as I had previously promised the Holy See." Peres's partner in crime, and the real founder of the Oslo Accord, Yossi Beilin, coordinated his PLO policy with the Vatican. Check the timing; at the same moment that he was finagling an accord with the PLO, he was negotiating an agreement for Vatican recognition of Israel. His deal with the pope became another brief scandal when politicians like Agudat Yisrael head Avraham Shapira and Jerusalem Deputy Mayor, Shmuel Meir were leaked hidden details of Beilin's accord which included, "the extra-territoriality of holy sites in Jerusalem to be transferred to Vatican control." Later, Shapira was neutralized by having $250 million is debts accrued by his crooked carpet factory forgiven, while Meir was permanently hushed when his car was crushed by a UN truck driven by a PLO driver. The driver, of course, was released forever after being briefly questioned by Israel Police. By 2001, the current Foreign Minister Shlomo Ben Ami was shuttling between King Carlos of Spain and the Vatican. That is where the action is for the Israeli government today, and when things get serious, the focus shifts to Paris where Chirac, the US Secretary of State and Arafat await him. There is no question whatsoever that the Vatican wants Israel off the Temple Mount and that the Israeli leadership is accommodating their desire. But the PLO has plans of its own. By the summer of 2000, they began digging under the Temple Mount in earnest. Originally they claimed they were simply expanding a mosque under Solomon's Stables, beneath the Damascus Gate of Jerusalem's walled Old City. However, the huge mounds of earth and artifacts from the Second Temple that were being dumped in nearby wadis betrayed a much more extensive plan. On January 26, 2001, the Israeli government's television outlet, Channel One, broadcast a video clip secretly filmed under the Shrine of Omar, the 7th century Islamic building which may have been deliberately constructed over the Holy of Holies, the most sacred prayer room of the ancient Temple. The video revealed a new and massive tunnel aimed directly at the most sacred core of Solomon's and later, Herod's Temples. The PLO are after not only the treasures buried beneath the Temple to deplete their morally and financially bankrupt regime of terror but must be looking for more scrolls that can be used to blackmail the Vatican and thus get their way in world diplomacy. The Vatican is terrified that the Jews will uncover the truth under the Temple, whatever it may be. It is essential for them that Israel is removed from the Holy Mount. And they are not alone in this desire. Now we come full circle to Alisdair Sinclair's heart. On Jan. 4, 2001, Colin Grant published a full front page expose of the scandal in the Glasgow Sunday Post. He revealed that the Knights Templar, as descendents the Davidic line believe they have a right to reclaim the Temple Mount as their rightful heritage: "A spokesman for Militi Templi Scotia, the Scottish Knights Templar admitted to the Sunday Post, 'We are currently involved in an attempt to remove control of the holy sites from the Israeli government. We believe they should be administered by the United Nations and are working with the UN and NATO to achieve that goal.'" A secret Medieval battle over the Temple Mount is being conducted in Israel today and unless it can be stopped, this skirmish has the potential of dragging the whole planet into war. end |
February 9 - No Reason to Celebrate Sharon's Victory. |
My message, to those who respect it, is clear. The Israeli political leadership has been corrupted from abroad and no one running for Prime Minister is exempt. And that includes Ariel Sharon above all. I can understand the widespread celebration of his unprecedented rout of Ehud Barak. Finally, those elements determined to drag Israel into a suicidal pact with the PLO have been given a resounding message that the people have had it with them. As a temporary relief valve this election served a most therapeutic function. Unfortunately too many people think Sharon's victory means the war has been won and they are about to be very disappointed because Sharon will betray them just as much as Barak did. Only the style will change. Here's how we got the elections in the first place. On a Wednesday six weeks ago, Binyamin Netanyahu was in the middle of a lucrative American speaking tour. There, he met two members of the Council On Foreign Relations (CFR), George Shultz and Henry Kissinger. In Netanyahu's own words, they told him the time was right to run for prime minister; a very noble message except elections weren't planned for another two years. Netanyahu then hopped on a plane to Israel, he claimed to attend a Bat Mitzvah, had a few words with Barak and flew back to America to continue his lectures. Two days later Barak, who Kissinger and gang put in power beginning with a New York meeting in May 1995, resigned and called for elections in which he would remain a candidate. Now why would he do such an insane thing unless told to? He was losing badly in the polls and began the race in a hopeless position. Then he continued with a campaign Guaranteed issue health insurance to get him trounced at the polls. The CFR determined that it was Sharon's turn to drag Israel into war. Barak had prepared the path and now Sharon would lead the war. And the world and its Jews, getting dumber by the day, believe that all these events will be explained by random actions. A few years back I received a phone call from New York from Joel Bainerman, who was attending an Israeli economic conference at the Sheraton Hotel in Manhattan. Excited, he said, "I was walking through a hall and guess who I saw come out of a conference room? Sharon and Kissinger." Joel told the same story to journalists covering the conference and at the next morning's press conference Sharon confirmed the meeting adding that, "In order to achieve peace, concessions will have to be made." He was asked if he meant territorial concessions and he refused to answer. Kissinger's talk had moulded the man. Meanwhile, I called Sharon's spokesman Raanan Gissen and asked him what was discussed at the meeting. He replied, "They met to discuss overall Middle East security issues." I asked why Sharon, the Infrastructure Minister should be discussing security matters at a trade conference. He answered, "You're right, of course. They were discussing economic matters." I persisted, "Why was Sharon meeting Kissinger in the first place?" The reply was boggling; "Minister Sharon has met Mr. Kissinger every time he has flown to America since the end of the Yom Kippur War." This was way too much to digest so quickly. I blurted out, "What do you know about Kissinger's leadership in the Council On Foreign Relations?" Gissen paused and answered, "Mr. Sharon has left instructions that this topic will only be discussed when he writes his diplomatic memoirs." Ariel Sharon was born and raised on a radical-Left Mapai moshav, Kfar Malal. In early 1973 he quit the IDF and formed a political party, Shlomzion, whose followers were anticipated to be from the Left. Sharon even invited the extremist Yossi Sarid to join him in the party leadership. In October of the same year, war broke out and Sharon emerged the national hero. Now his political career would rise and the CFR decided that he had to be on their side. He met with Kissinger and his proteges in early 1974 and received their power and blessings for a rise to the top, but with conditions. The first was that he become a mole in the Israeli Right and that he destroy the Herut movement. He returned to Israel, built up his party and proposed a united Right wing party to run in the 1977 elections. He amalgamated the Liberal (Gahal) Party with his own and Herut to create the Likud. The election of the honorable and independent Likud leader Menachem Begin sent the CFR into a tizzy and Sharon was called on to neutralize and ultimately remove him. Before that could be done, Begin was outflanked by Egyptian leader Anwar Sadat and with all the power of the CFR behind the Egyptian position, Begin relented and withdrew from the entire Sinai Peninsula. The withdrawal could only proceed because Sharon was leading it. When one stubborn town, Yamit refused to be obliterated, Sharon sent in the bulldozers to do the job, one reason he is known as "the bulldozer," and a better reason to fear his real policy on uprooting Jewish homes. On June 6, 1982, my army unit entered the Lebanon War. Following a trail of battles, we finally arrived at our position on Jebel Barauch, high in the Chouf Mountains, 80 km. from the safety of the Israeli border. We gathered around the tv set for the evening news and we heard Defence Minister Sharon's lie to Begin that the troops would stop advancing once they had reached the 40 km. line in Lebanon. We were stunned. The nation and its Prime Minister were being given a totally false picture of the war by Sharon. We all asked why and no answer was satisfactory. A decade later Joel Bainerman and I spent an afternoon interviewing Menachem's son, Benny Begin. He was very coy with the facts we sought but, nonetheless, provided vital testimony. His father's war had been fought mostly to reverse a deal reached by Kissinger, Rabin and Syrian President Assad in 1975. Assad wanted Israel off the Golan Heights, Rabin couldn't deliver so Kissinger came up with a neat idea. Syria wanted Lebanon just as much, so let's give her it. We'll ignite a civil war and Israel will allow Syrian troops in to bring peace. Benny Begin recalled. "Rabin laughed when he told this story and I said, 'Why are you so happy, 300,000 people died in that war?' He smiled and answered. 'Don't worry, it was a good deal.'" Menachem Begin's goal was to reverse the Middle East of murder organized by the CFR and Sharon's task was to stop him. Benny Begin stressed one point without adding the precise details we sought; Sharon deliberately ousted his father from office. We now recall the 1983 massacre at the Sabra and Shatilla refugee camps. On a Friday morning, Sharon gave permission for Phalangist forces to eliminate remaining PLO snipers in the camps. The Phalangists had been victimized by savage PLO massacres and Sharon must have known how they would react if given a free hand to operate in the camps. Word of the massacre reached him by the night but he did not order the Phalangists removed for two more days. Sharon suffered a temporary career setback for his negligence but this was the beginning of the end of Menachem Begin. Sharon has been a magnificent performer, building on his deserved reputation as a daring commander, since 1974 he has been the darling of the Right. And since his rise, the Right has been slowly disintegrating. When Netanyahu was ordered by his CFR masters to sign the upcoming Wye Agreement, which gave the PLO more territory than Rabin or Peres ever handed over, both they and he understood that a huge ploy was needed to prevent massive protest against the outrage. So Netanyahu appointed Sharon his Foreign Minister, and barely a week later, Sharon gave his seal of approval to Wye. How could anyone protest when the militant, darling of the Right authorized all its clauses? Early on during the recent election campaign, numerous Israeli journalists wrote that Shimon Peres and Sharon were plotting against Barak. The goal this time, was to have Sharon's buddy Peres replace Barak as the Labor candidate. However, Barak caught on and fought back with the strongest weapon in his arsenal; Peres's organization of the Rabin assassination. The far left Meretz Party was about to back a motion led by Yossi Sarid, to make Peres their candidate for the elections. Their central council was all ready to approve Peres when according to Yediot Ahronot, "Rabin sent a messenger to remind the council members about Yitzhak Rabin." Meretz then changed its mind about Peres. The media speculated that Barak reminded the Meretz members that Peres snitched on Rabin about an illegal bank account in 1977 that drove him from office or that Rabin called Peres, "a relentless conniver," as if those facts weren't known and that they could turn the party against Peres. Despite the Meretz rejection, Peres called out all his forces, especially in the media, to mount a campaign to replace Barak with him. Then Barak appeared on a morning radio show on Reshet Bet and said that if Peres didn't stop his campaign, he was going to talk to the Rabin family about the assassination. Peres's campaign to replace Barak came to a grinding halt. Every available Saturday afternoon, for over twenty years, Sharon and Peres meet at Peres's home for what they call "social visits." At Peres's 75th birthday party, Sharon was placed in the seat of honor beside him. They are the closest of friends and their "vicious" rivalry over the years has been brilliantly stage managed. Do not be surprised if the happy couple come out of the closet and into the Knesset. If Sharon has his way, Peres will be his Foreign Minister. Yes, he knows about Rabin, all the insiders do. So Sharon will fight any legal action which could bring justice to the memory of Rabin by trying his real murderers. He'll protect his buddy Shimon with all the considerable powers he has just received. And Israel will go to war under Sharon, not because of him, he is just the right "hard-line, militant" pawn to justify bloody violence against the Jewish nation, but because the real powers who rule this planet have planned it that way all along. |
|
Please click here to buy Barry`s books, CD`s & Videos... canadian drug store, Health Insurance, Medicare supplement insurance, Long Term Care, Guaranteed issue health insurance, Cheap Dental insurance |